Quantcast

Video of the Day
Loading..
Masthead

Alex Carnevale (e-mail)
Editor-in-Chief            
                                
Molly Lambert (e-mail)         
Managing Editor          
                                  
Will Hubbard            
Executive Editor

Durga Chew-Bose (e-mail)    
Senior Editor

This Recording

is dedicated to the enjoyment of audio and visual stimuli. Please visit our archives where we have uncovered the true importance of nearly everything. Should you want to reach us, e-mail alex dot carnevale at gmail dot com, but don't tell the spam robots. Consider contacting us if you wish to use This Recording in your classroom or club setting. We have given several talks at local Rotarys that we feel went really well.

The Kenny Powers Mix to rule them all

The consumption of J.D. Salinger

Ernest Hemingway's sex life

Molly Lambert dresses down the new masculinity

The most appealing men Disney has to offer

Elizabeth Gumport's Escape to New York

Jamie Beck's tribute to Billie Holiday

A list of important turn-offs

Elizabeth Gumport on Dawn Powell's New York

Go away with the Pixies

The wealthy children of Metropolitan

Spend your youth with Frank O'Hara

Molly is the star of her own Late Shift

This Recording Reviews Mad Men

Warren Beatty and L.A. movies

Colin Dickey's skull recordings

Alex Carnevale's 'In the Aughts'

Comments? Requests?
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Search TR


    Classic Recordings
    Woody Allen Week

    Robert Altman Week

    The Print Edition
    Thursday
    Sep022010

    In Which Elizabeth Bowen Lives In Windowless Rooms

    Don't Bat An Eyelid

    by JANE HU

    I bussed down to New York City this past week in hopes of extracting some form of a mini-break before the start of school. The city posed as a welcome escape from my summer of windowless offices and libraries, where I scoured databases and watched films in unventilated screening rooms. On the ride over, between fantasizing about the parks I would breeze around, I sent my professor an e-mail: "I just wanted to let you know I'm in NYC for this week. If there's anything I can do here in relation to Bowen, etc. let me know!"

    I am writing my thesis on Anglo-Irish writer Elizabeth Bowen and, wherever I go, she always haunts the back of my mind. Incidentally, there were manuscripts to be found at the Berg Collection of the New York Public Library, which was precisely where I spent the majority of my mini-break.

    A lover of archives, I was seven when I received my first diary and have kept one ever since. I recall years when I wouldn’t sleep without logging an entry — the day could only end after my written acknowledgement. Past my bedtime, crouched under the covers, I would blindly scrawl out notes of apparent insignificance. "My piano test is over and I’m very happy." "I just came home from Bingo! Tonight I did not win anything but oh well." "Something is wrong with my watch." I’ve always believed in documenting life and perhaps Bowen said it best: "Those without memories don’t know what is what."

    Born 1899 in Dublin, Bowen spent the first seven years of her life migrating between Bowen’s Court, her large family house in County Cork, and her home in Dublin. Growing up, the Bowens kept a close eye on Elizabeth’s development: she was never to drink too much milk; she was always to wear gloves to avoid freckling. Elizabeth was also not allowed to learn to read until she was seven since it was common knowledge that Bowen’s overworked their brains. Part of this may have held some truth for her father, a lawyer, suffered a mental breakdown from which he never recovered. Elizabeth was around five when he took for the worse, yet she arose nearly unscathed: "I had come out of the tension and mystery of my father’s illness, the apprehensive silence or chaotic shoutings... with nothing more disastrous than a stammer." Perhaps it was this stammer that contributed to Bowen’s inimitable style — a use of inverted syntax that never includes a single unnecessary word.

    Bowen's densely psychological narratives carried the sensibilities of nineteenth-century realism into modernism, where her twisted sentences emphasized the uncanny aspects of daily existence. My favorite prose of hers is found in her 1935 novel The House in Paris, where Karen delivers an internal monologue on her already thwarted future. Bowen exposes Karen’s conceptual twists of time and memory in labyrinthine sentences that you cannot help but indulge in:

    These hours are only hours. They cannot be again, but no hours can. Hours in a room with a lamp and a tree outside, with tomorrow eating into them. The grass sprang up when we took our hands away. The maid will make this bed and fold back two corners of eiderdown like they were folded back when I put my hat on it.... I cannot see him to see what a child would be like. Though there will not be a child, that is why I want to see him. If a child were going to be born, there would still be something that had to be. Tonight would be more then than hours and that lamp. It would have been the hour of my death. I should have to do what I dread, see them know. There would still be something to dread. I should see the hour in the child. I should not have rushed on to nothing. He would be the mark our hands did not leave on the grass, he would be the tamarisks we only half saw. And he would be the I whose bed Naomi sat on, the Max whose sleeve I brushed rain off: tender and guardable.

    Following Henry James, whom she frequently emulated, Bowen believed in "the treatment of an incident, crisis, or, situation which the writer feels to be of greater importance than its apparent triviality might show." Because she valued tradition and good manners, readers often judge her as a snobbish conservative. These critics miss Bowen’s acute sense of empathy, which evince her open progressiveness. On the declining institution of the Irish manor, she reveals her social intuition:

    Or is it the fear that, if one goes into the big house, one will have to be ‘polite’? Well, why not be polite—are not humane manners the crown of being human at all? Politeness is not constriction; it is a grace: it is really no worse than an exercise of the imagination on other people’s behalf. And are we to cut grace quite out of life?

    If you’ve heard Bowen’s name, it was most likely from an encounter with her 1938 novel The Death of the Heart  or 1949's The Heat of the Day. Both energetically plotted and cohesive narratives, these two works have grown to become her most well known. In the latter, Bowen registers the violent shifts experienced in the two world wars, the Troubles, and the Irish Civil War. Her war fiction portrays sleepwalkers who, although not dead, were neither fully alive. Aside from her novels, which are read less than they should, Bowen is also one of the most underrated short story writers of this century. Whereas longer narratives allow for full-length character development, Bowen used the compressed quality of short fiction to create more fantastical and metonymic worlds. Her prominent ability to create an atmosphere of tension and tautness cuts most clearly in the shorter works. Here, the quiet ghosts and haunted figures of her novels emerge as full-blown, speaking phantoms.

    All romantic notions aside, Bowen viewed herself as a professional writer who worked steadily at her desk throughout the day. On top of writing fiction, which Bowen equated to living life, she also published numerous essays and articles. Responsible for both her London house in Regent’s Park and the inherited Bowen’s Court, Bowen needed her writing to earn a profit.

    bowen court

    By the late 1930s, Bowen had reached an international reputation that continued to grow into the 1940s. Although her essays produced a significant amount of her income, Bowen nonetheless felt her journalism as subordinate to her fiction. Even late in life, she rejected her status as a critic: "I do not really consider myself a critic – I do not think, really, that a novelist should be a critic; but, by some sort of irresistible force, criticism seems to come almost every novelist’s way. I write, at intervals, for The New Statesman, The Listener, Vogue, Harper’s Bazaar; and do request articles, from time to time, for papers too diverse to enumerate."

    Since her death in 1973, interest and scholarship in Bowen has waned, although there seems to have been a revival this past decade. Victoria Glendinning’s foreword to her excellent biography on Bowen properly states, "She is to be spoken of in the same breath as Virginia Woolf, on whom much more breath has been expended." Glendinning goes on to acknowledge that Bowen is what came after Bloomsbury. "She is the link which connects Virginia Woolf and Iris Murdoch and Muriel Spark."

    My first Bowen novel was The Death of the Heart, where I met the intelligent orphan Portia in all her sixteen years of bright innocence. Nineteen myself at the time, I encountered Portia’s utter artlessness with uncomfortable familiarity. Having already fallen for the female protagonists of Edith Wharton and Henry James, who, for me, exemplified heartbreaking innocence, it was clear that Portia belonged to the same breath as Daisy Miller, Isabel Archer, and Lily Bart. Portia was fragile and stubborn, hopeful and despairing, curious while asking all the wrong questions. Similar to how I felt at sixteen, Portia was full of an unself-awareness that simultaneously melted with her own self-importance. So overwhelmingly innocent, she could not perceive the mess she made for those around her.

    Portia keeps a saccharine diary that gets covertly passed between adults and which consequently lands under the reader’s eyes too. I cringed through each of these entries in a way that only happens when one encounters oneself caught off-guard; I might have been rereading my own not-so-distant maudlin thoughts. Portia is mistakenly — but predictably — in love with a cad named Eddie and she writes, “He says he had lunch with Anna and that she was nice. He says he did think of ringing me up, but he did not. He does not say why. He says he feels he is starting a new life.” And like many young girls, Portia finds sweetness in the mundane:

    After supper, I sat on our rug in front of Thomas’ fire. I thought some of the things that Eddie had told me on this rug.
    His father is a builder.
    When he was a child he knew pieces of the Bible straight off by heart.
    He is quite afraid of the dark.
    His two favourite foods are cheese straws and jellied consommé.  
    He would not really like to be very rich.
    He says that when you love someone all your saved-up wishes start coming out.
    He does not like being laughed at, so he pretends he wants people to laugh at him.
    He has thirty-six ties.

    Although she goes on painfully for pages about the undeserving Eddie, Portia’s diary reveals glimpses of the discerning woman she will become: "Thomas said he did not know what had put this into his head and after that he gave me a sort of look when he did not think I was looking."

    In A.S. Byatt’s introduction to The House in Paris, she asserts "that Elizabeth Bowen has got Henrietta right. Adult readers are given to saying, of children like Henrietta, that ‘real’ children are not so sophisticated, so articulate, so thoughtful. What I remember with absolute clarity from this reading was a feeling that the private analyses I made to myself of things were vindicated, the confusions I was aware of were real, and presumably important and interesting, since here they were described." Bowen’s words reassured me that a sixteen year-old girl’s perspective and opinions mattered. While her fiction was forever concerned with young girlhood, her journalistic work included portraits on the emerging population of "teenagers." While this rising community struck many adults as tragic and foreign, Bowen strove to understand them. Her novels are evidence of her success.

    Since The Death of the Heart, I have read both Bowen’s fictional letters and those she wrote in real life to Eudora Welty, Virginia Woolf, May Sarton, Charles Ritchie, and many others. She was a voracious letter writer and would easily send out a dozen before the lunch bell rang. Writing between the two world wars, Bowen lived through a time of enormous upheaval as gramophones, typewriters, and cinema rose in ubiquity. Not surprisingly, she often viewed the idea of immediate communication as a threat to privacy and society: "The motor car demolishes distances, and the telephone and wireless keep the house knit up, perhaps too much, with the world."

    Wherever Bowen travelled, she contemplated the force of memory and the past. "In Rome I wondered how to break down the barrier between myself and happenings outside my memory. I was looking for splinters of actuality in a shifting mass of experience other than my own. Time is one kind of space; it creates distance." As I read her letters in the Berg Collection and hold the pages she once touched, I feel a similar collapse of distance between me and the writer I love. I embrace the honeyed corniness and romanticism of the whole scenario and, suddenly, Bowen feels present. Somewhere along her nearly-illegible cursive, I see both the vulnerability of Elizabeth Bowen, Portia, and myself.

    I have kept a diary for fourteen years now and, maybe because I am less innocent or more “sophisticated,” "articulate," and "thoughtful," I no longer tear out pages that present me in an undesirable light. Other times, in a bout of inspiration, I will flip out my stationary, thumb through the drawer for stamps, and pen a few cards until my hand begins to cramp and my thoughts start to drift. At this point, I’ll pull out To the North, which features my favorite Bowen lady, Emmeline. She is the magnetic character Bowen believed every story required — the one with whom we’re supposed to fall in love. Needless to say, I fell.

    Bowen’s young women "play in a foreign language of which they know not one word," all the while discouraged by laughably smug boys to "Lock everything up; hide everything! Don’t bat an eyelid ever." This faulty advice never works. Bowen’s guileless girls write as a way of becoming. Late one night, Portia cries about the adults who dictate her life, "They would forgive me if I were something special. But I don’t know what I was meant to be." I'm twenty-one now and with each passing day, I don't relate less to Portia, but more.

    Jane Hu is a contributor to This Recording. She is a writer living in Montreal. This is her first appearance in these pages. She tumbls here and twitters here.

    "Hard to Please" - The Weepies (mp3)

    "Hummingbird" - The Weepies (mp3)

    "Be My Honeypie" - The Weepies (mp3)

    Wednesday
    Sep012010

    In Which School's Out Forever, School's Been Blown To Pieces

    September Song (or, Twenty Years Of Schooling & They Put You On The Day Shift)

    by MOLLY LAMBERT

    Here comes September to cut into the sweaty, humid, unemployed, depressed cake that was August before it weeps any more pink frosting onto the dirty kitchen floor!

    I grew up fetishizing cold weather, because it was not a thing we really have in Los Angeles. Years of exposure to books set in prep schools or written by Johns Updike and Cheever cultivated in me the strong Jewish/Catholic lust for east coast WASPs and their culture. I especially fetishized fall, with its scarves and coats and coziness.

    Fall is when school starts, it's when the new TV season traditionally begins, and summer popcorn movies are replaced by Oscar-bait movies. Magazines get thick again (or they used to) and all of the new products are suddenly "pumpkin" or "plum." 

    September for me has always meant my birthday, which talk about your buildup to a non life-changing event. Nothing changes on your birthday. Nothing especially changes on New Year's. So why do we expect so much from our Septembers?

    Well for one, September is when kids go back to school, which implies the return of structure to where there was none. Even if you went to camp or worked all summer break, August was about the antsiness building up for something new to happen.

    We spend the bulk of our youths, a ridiculously long amount of our lives, on a strict calendar whose organizing principle is school starting in the early fall. It is not hard to imagine that vestigially we still feel like we are going back to school every September.

    Until I lived on the east coast during college, I had no idea that scarves served an actual function (keeping your neck warm). I also knew nothing about the secret undertow of autumn's nostalgia, which is DREAD. The trade-off for the beautiful natural spectacle of New England autumn is that it becomes New England winter.

    In California the fall crispness is just a prelude to more of the same during winter, but in most other places it acts as foreshadowing that within a couple of months it'll be too cold to keep your eyes open outside. Fall nostalgia has a morbid undercurrent. The leaves are beautiful but they are dying. Back to school's second self is Halloween.

    It's like we subconsciously internalize the seasonal change. Studies have shown that external stimulants like sounds and smells have a huge impact on influencing human behavior. Is that why everyone freaks the fuck out at the end of summer even though they are no longer going back to school? Something about seeing all those pencils and backpacks just triggers the deep desire we all have to hit the reset button on our lives.

    Most of the people I know are freelancers in one sense or another, and their career paths involve amorphous to-do lists and shitty day jobs or erratic work. Because I have nothing else to compare it to, it is hard for me to feel like being in your twenties right now is any different than being in your twenties at any point during the last century. 

    The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both. And so the flip side of anticipation is dread.

    You can anticipate good things happening with the seasonal change, but because you absolutely cannot predict in advance them there is also endless dread of worst case scenarios, even though the chance of every situation playing out nightmarishly is low. 

    You might not have a decent job or an apartment or whatever right now, but that doesn't make you the kind of person who is incapable of having those things. It just makes you someone who doesn't happen to have all of them right now, which is most people at most points in most of their lives. It's not a comment on your true self.

    The thing about external factors beyond your control (like the horrible economy and its many attendant trickle-down woes) is that they do change unexpectedly and in a way that is impossible to always predict accurately, much like the weather. 

    In the meantime all you can do is stay as positive as possible, keep putting in work, and maybe eat some pumpkin bread in a scarf and coat by a duck pond around dusk. 

    Molly Lambert is the managing editor of This Recording. She tumbls here and twitters here.

    digg delicious reddit stumble facebook twitter subscribe

    "Nobody's Hero" - Stiff Little Fingers (mp3)

    "Straw Dogs" - Stiff Little Fingers (mp3)

    "No Change" - Stiff Little Fingers (mp3)

    Tuesday
    Aug312010

    In Which We Burn Down The House Just To Watch It Burn 

    Nothing's Shocking

    by JESSE KLEIN

    Ex-Drummer

    dir. Koen Mortier

    90 minutes

    It’s getting pretty hard to find something that’s taboo. At this point, you have to remove Charlotte Gainsbourg’s clitoris, and even then… Well, most films have the requisite number of shots of  the upper-division of the female torso and, increasingly, the upper-division of the lower-division of both women and men. You don’t even have to watch a movie with subtitles anymore to see special parts, or, even, special parts touching. At this point, something needs to be removed for it to register as racy, or the special parts need to have originated from the same special part and then touch. Then Ex-Drummer was made.  

    Ex-Drummer, a Belgian film directed by Koen Mortier and recently released in the US on DVD by Palisades Tartan, is post-taboo. It’s not immoral. It’s not amoral. It’s post-moral. There is no compass. No cause and effect. In some scenes, there’s not even gravity. It is as if Murphy’s Law and the Peter Principle were brothers, got married, and adopted.  

    The premise: Three ‘handicapped’ Flemish guys (they’re not handicapped in the more traditional, actual sense of the word) need a drummer. One of their Moms (a Mom who is now bald after losing her hair instantly upon catching her teenage son masturbating, a son who is now instantly paralyzed in his right arm, the arm he was using to… well, that’s his handicap) recommends a famous writer. This writer cannot play the drums. Has never played the drums. This is his handicap. He agrees. They decide on ‘The Feminists’ as their band name because four handicap guys are "about as useful as a group of feminists." It’s onwards and upwards from there.  

    The writer, Dries, agrees to join the band believing that these new relationships will inspire his writing. But Dries doesn’t write at any point in this film, at least not literally; he writes with the other characters, he creates the events that take place. He is God-like, though more like God’s confrere. Dries creates something from nothing, a band where there were four ‘handicapped' men, music where there was only noise, hatred from inertia; he shows us how easy it is to fall, how good it can feel. Dries (played by Dries Van Hegen) is smart, sexy, familiar yet totally foreign. We relate to Dries and then feel shame for having done so. 

    The ‘handicapped’ band member with the paralyzed right arm, Jan, is the only character with a family. His family is Ma and Pa Verbeek, Ma the aforementioned bald matriarch, a foul-mouthed woman—well, really just foul in general — and Pa, a man confined to his bed where he lies in a straitjacket for undisclosed, though presumably legitimate reasons. In one scene, Jan sits next to his father on the bed, cleaning him as they chat, a moment that is civil, familial, almost tender. Before exiting, Jan leans down to his father, their noses touching and whispers, "Loser," and exits. This scene is typical of the film: no justification of character’s actions, no internal logic on why anyone does anything. In Ex-Drummer, people change their minds, do things devoid of logic, hurt each other, hurt themselves. For no reason. The traditional motivations and inherent logic that govern most characters, and people, are absent; instead lies randomness, meaninglessness, chaos.   

    Yet somewhere amidst the violence and depravity is humor. The absurdity, the sheer impossible madness of it, forces us to laugh. In Samuel Beckett’s Watt, Arsene talks about the three laughs: ethical, intellectual and mirthless. The "bitter laugh laughs at that which is not good" is ethical. The "hollow laugh laughs at that which is not true" is intellectual. But the mirthless laugh "is the laugh of laughs, the risus purus (pure laugh), the laugh laughing at the laugh, the beholding, saluting of the highest joke, in a word the laugh that laughs . . . at that which is unhappy." There is no mirth to be found in this movie, and yet we laugh. Not at or with, but because of, or in spite of. Maybe it’s all three. We start to laugh because we know it’s not good. Then because we can’t believe it to be true. And then, finally, because we know it is. We laugh because we know a world this depraved could exist. Because we know it does.  

    An example. There’s a character named Big Dick. When Dries asks if his name is due to literal or metaphoric endowment, he calls in his wife. Then, after the mandatory nuptial name-calling, they are in her vagina. Standing there. Admiring his handiwork. Then, they’re back at the table in his trailer as if he and Dries had just taken a tour of the place. We laugh (or I laughed) at such a moment because what other reaction is appropriate? Such absurdity can only be met with laughter, a timid laugh, like when you’re reading an inappropriate book on the subway, but a laugh all the same.  

    The other two band members, Koen (handicap: bad lisp) and Ivan (deaf), complete The Feminists. Koen, the lead singer, is nihilism incarnate; he "specializes" in assault and is aroused by Ma Verbeek, the obese woman twenty years his senior — he later tells her she has a "sexy stomach" in an attempt to woo her (read: he says this while taking her clothes off while she fervently resists). He’s also the one who lives upside down. Koen lives to destroy; he does not differentiate between people, property, friendships, or himself. They’re just things he can break, can enjoy breaking, can move on to new things to break after having broken them. It’s Ivan, the bassist, who has a smack of compassion; he is the only thing the audience can recognize as human. He’s married, though his wife and he engage in little more than abuse of various sorts (verbal, physical, drug et al).

    Due to blind neglect, their daughter dies, echoing the death in Trainspotting of Sick Boy’s daughter. But in Ex-Drummer though characters suffer, feel pain, they don’t change. This extreme and absolute misery is par for the course; they accept it as if they knew it would happen all along, as if it’s supposed to. 

    Ex-Drummer is compared to Trainspotting though the similarities are skin-deep; like saying two paintings are alike because they both have apples in them. Trainspotting is slick, often quite funny, but does not disturb, or resonate, to the same extent. In Trainspotting, people do despicable, deplorable things because they are addicted to drugs, because they feel they have no choice. In Ex-Drummer, people do bad things because they can. Because it’s better than not doing them. At the end of Danny Boyle’s film, we see Darwin triumph with a knowing smile on Ewan McGregor’s face. Ex-Drummer concludes with what can only be called a complete demolition, an apocalypse. Dries aside, no one gets out in one piece, Big Dick included. With seductive music as accompaniment, we see these people destroy each other, then, once dead, reflect on the vapidity of their lives with a cool, detached tone. It leaves its few surviving characters in their original state, a world of fear and stupidity. 

    Reviewers and audiences have called Koen Mortier’s film morally repugnant— Variety labeling it "a new low in post-modern smug superiority", Slant claiming it is "just another unpleasant picture with awful people doing awful things to one another, in the service of empty shock" — but this rejection only underlines the film’s resonance. The film unsettles, because it works, because it’s good. It’s often hilarious, at times heartbreaking, and together seldom beautiful. It shows how beautiful destruction can be. And that’s what makes it scary. Ex-Drummer killed taboo. That’s why it’s worth watching. 

    Jesse Klein is a contributor to This Recording. This is his first appearance in these pages. He recently completed his first film, Shadowboxing.

    "Manifest Destiny" - Zola Jesus (mp3)

    "Soeur Sewer" - Zola Jesus (mp3)

    "Sea Talk" - Zola Jesus (mp3)