Video of the Day


Alex Carnevale

Features Editor
Mia Nguyen

Reviews Editor
Ethan Peterson

This Recording

is dedicated to the enjoyment of audio and visual stimuli. Please visit our archives where we have uncovered the true importance of nearly everything. Should you want to reach us, e-mail alex dot carnevale at gmail dot com, but don't tell the spam robots. Consider contacting us if you wish to use This Recording in your classroom or club setting. We have given several talks at local Rotarys that we feel went really well.

Pretty used to being with Gwyneth

Regrets that her mother did not smoke

Frank in all directions

Jean Cocteau and Jean Marais

Simply cannot go back to them

Roll your eyes at Samuel Beckett

John Gregory Dunne and Joan Didion

Metaphors with eyes

Life of Mary MacLane

Circle what it is you want

Not really talking about women, just Diane

Felicity's disguise

Live and Active Affiliates
This area does not yet contain any content.

« In Which We Experience A Sinister Paris »

This week we look back at the films of Roman Polanski.



120 minutes
dir. Roman Polanski

When did Harrison Ford stop caring about acting? Did he ever start, in the first place? His best characters make lazy insouciance a virtue. His worst (as in last year’s Morning Glory) come from writers and directors who don’t know the difference between Indiana Jones-y insouciance and simple grouchiness. Roman Polanski’s Frantic doesn’t ask Ford to have a cool attitude (per the title, he spends the movie in a panicky state Indy or Han Solo wouldn’t recognize) and nor does it require him to put on the crabbed, curdled grunt-whine he finds more easily accessible with every new movie.

Frantic is a deeply strange movie in many of its particulars, not least in its treatment of its star. Ford’s character, a doctor from San Francisco whose wife is kidnapped on a Paris vacation, is the squarest man on earth. His temper rarely rises during his search for his wife, and when it does, it’s with the sort of doofy impotence more familiar from Steve Martin characters. An official asks him, over the phone, to spell his location, and Ford shouts, “With an ‘S’—for ‘Shithead’!”

Even his successes are conditional on your accepting that the world of Frantic is moved more by charisma than by intelligence: Emmanuelle Seigner’s character, who combines, here, the look-and-pout acting ability of a WB starlet with the leather-studs-and-suspenders wardrobe of an S&M Elaine Benes, tells Harrison Ford that while what she’d smuggled into Paris set the plot into motion, it definitely was not drugs. “Then what was it,” mumbles Ford, who barely gets to finish before Seigner cuts him off: “Okay, it was dope!”

The differences between Frantic and Chinatown are instructive — while both Harrison Ford and Jack Nicholson are world-class at phoning in performances, Nicholson at least has to enact the process of learning about his environment. Because he never acclimates to Paris, Ford’s performance, as written, is sheer confusion merged with brief eruptions of rage. You keep thinking that no movie would have its character try to find his wife by going to a mysterious bar, meeting a nefarious character (Polanski signals his evil by having him speak English near-perfectly, but with a Jamaican accent), get offered “the white lady” and actually believe it was a Caucasian female, then get forced to snort cocaine in a bathroom stall. That the cocaine has no noticeable effect means that Ford’s character is either superhuman or superhumanly oblivious.

Ford’s perplexity can’t entirely be blamed on Ford — after all, the character doesn’t really even suit his persona. Frantic depicts an intractable world in which, upon the kidnapping of Ford’s wife, hotel employees and government officials treat it as the occasion to have a laugh and a cigarette. The authorities are impotent and that which they ought to be fighting — a shadow universe of evil, in which the Arab terrorists who kidnapped the wife, naturally, and random low-level drug dealers are all part of the same sinister Paris — is uncontrollable and unstoppable and both random and not. At first it strikes without reason, and then everything begins to look like a sign the world is corrupt, even the random guy at the bar who offers you “the white lady.” To politely decline would mean that you knew something about evil to begin with, which is itself evil.

To learn nothing, and to lash out angrily when confronted with quite how much one would have to learn, is the only sensible reaction. That, at the film’s end, Harrison Ford makes a terrible tactical decision and throws the device the armed terrorists seek into the river, makes perfect sense within this film’s universe. In any other movie, they’d have shot him immediately, or tried to. In this one, they stand dumbstruck at the act of goodness Ford backed into while whirling around.

Indiana Jones and Han Solo, to degrees, triumphed because of adventurism. Ford’s character here (whom I’ve gotten this far before saying is named Dr. Richard Walker, though if I mention Chinatown once more I will be obliged to mention the name Jake Gittes) triumphs because this is a movie, okay. And his triumph is deeply conditional, tied in as it is with the death of Emmanuelle Seigner.

Seigner, who married Polanski in real life the year after this movie came out, gives the movie its only moments of levity. She’s not amazing at acting, but her pouting and refusal to give much effort suits her character far more than it suits Ford’s. Who’s more likely to smirk her way through life: a model-pretty smuggler who has a Garfield phone in her apartment or a doctor from the Bay Area who just found out what cocaine is? Seigner gets bubble gum to pop in Ford’s face, too.

The character has to die not only because it gives the viewer the sense of something having happened over the course of the movie—the trouble with movies about bureaucratic rabbit holes is the evocation of the sense-memory of filling out paperwork, the most inconclusive human act. She also, while not evil herself, is a sign of the decadence of the world. She’s terrifically young, telling Ford she believes any four-year-old song is an “oldie.”

She dresses in leather or low-cut dresses and finds excuses related to the locating of Ford’s kidnapped wife to dance quite close to Ford, quite well. If she’d stuck around, the returned wife would have some questions to ask. Instead, she’s a martyr to lust and violence.

Chinatown exposes a world full of crime and greed; it’s about our own time, or Polanski’s when he made it, but it uses period-film signifiers. Evil seems so much more meaningful when it’s removed from contemporary tropes. The Arab terrorists in Frantic cannot be iconic. The indulgence in drugs and sex as signifier of evil is, in addition to being too like a trope whose meaning had by the mid-1980s eroded, seems a bit like Polanski’s self-flagellation. This was only the third movie he’d made since his exile from America, and the other two had been period pieces.

This is how Polanski saw the world — a sexpot dancing too close before she dies, triumph achieved only through yelling loudly and stumbling towards hypothetical vindication, away from a universe of authorities and nemeses who come to look yet more similar.

At one point, Ford finds himself on the roof, evading thugs who’re trying to get at Seigner’s smuggled booty while still hoping unrealistically he might save his wife. His shoe falls, and rather than showing us the distance it does, and Ford will, fall towards obliteration, Polanski has it glide slowly down the roof and come to rest safely upon a landing. That’s the trouble with Frantic — for all its depiction of a grief and panic that need not necessarily be inflicted by Arab terrorists, the film is removed from reality in all the wrong ways.

Frantic plays tonight at 7 pm at the Museum of Modern Art.

Daniel D'Addario is the senior contributor to This Recording. He is a writer living in Brooklyn. He last wrote in these pages about Our Idiot Brother. You can find an archive of his writing on This Recording here. You can find his website here.

"Sahara" - Quigley (mp3)

"If I Could Fly Into Your Arms" - Quigley (mp3)

"One Sad Knowingly So-Son" - Quigley (mp3)

References (18)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    If you enjoy football, you most likely have a preferred team from the National Football League or two and have a list of players who like to have observed.
  • Response
    NFL is truly one of the biggest sports in America. It has a key following.
  • Response
    In Which We Experience A Sinister Paris - Home - This Recording
  • Response
    Response: G
    In Which We Experience A Sinister Paris - Home - This Recording
  • Response
    I really happy to use your all services to my good education and good communication development. These all services have a different articles to improve the education of every student.
  • Response
  • Response
    Response: new year 2016
  • Response
    一般用藥 3 5天 復道回廊長約一千五百多米,復道行空、回廊曲折,既四通八達又能擋風遮雨西園以水池居中,池中央便是 威而剛的副作用 水心亭,這座水心亭是中國僅有的水中戲亭。 而作續集的 威而剛的副作用,便更有些盜夢 cialis 5mg 價格 的精度和難度了《教父》自面世以來所受到的好評以及備受推崇的地位不論在專業或小眾排行榜上的地位都是毋庸置疑的,特別是成功的續集將原著波瀾壯闊的黑道家族史盡可能恢弘且完整的搬到了熒幕上 cialis 5mg 價格,而“影史上最成功的續集”便是對它的最好評價。 大學里的教授一點都架子都沒有 犀利士 女友 ,
  • Response
    Response: 威而剛價錢
    有上帝就有撒旦 威爾剛 是什麼 這女生有點過了 威爾剛 是什麼!我也不吃!但是沒辦法別人吃的時候我就會主動讓他們直接給我下面片了!省得麻煩別人自己又吃不了 威而鋼 100毫克 太多! 反觀中國當前股市,與1929年和2007年的股市截然不同 威而鋼 100毫克。工業企業不斷上行,大眾創新萬眾創業熱情高漲,科技進步此起彼伏,國企改革、簡政放權釋放活力,有足夠的基礎來支撐目前的市場下半場的操作中,對于普通投資者 樂威壯副作用,建議采取謹慎策略,操作心理、交易心態非常重要。 在古代人文歷史上,300 樂威壯副作用 年之前人口從來沒有超過
  • Response
    Response: 威爾剛是什麼
    戰場風云多變 乐威壮 于文灝在2012年的一次體檢中 犀利士使用方法,被牙科醫生告知有兩個蛀牙。于文灝從來沒有蛀牙 乐威壮 ,但醫生這么一說,他也就重視起來醫生說現場就能補,于是于文灝就補了兩個蛀牙,花 犀利士使用方法 費500元錢。 所以今年我們在醫藥研究經常遇到這樣的問題,有些公司它以前和醫藥沒有關系,但是它通過收購進入這個行業,比如像姚記撲克 犀利士 半顆,因為他收購了上海細胞治療工程技術研究中信有限公司,所以就進入了這個領域,另外還有一些公司變化三:產業資本對二級市場的影響越來越大。 因此,欽州 犀利士 半顆 成
  • Response
    這絕對是兩人朝夕相處 “我們每年都要'勸退'很多學員。一個僅僅想要找份謀生差事的人 樂威壯價錢,哪怕在 樂威壯價錢 易途呆上一天,對他來說 犀利士香港買 ,也是浪費時間。”易途JAVA的相關負責人開玩笑說易途堅持認為,方向比努力更重要。在易途的講師們看來,只有真正喜歡軟件開發的人,才能潛心去學習、深入研究,從而成為一個真正的軟件開發人“培訓機構的本質是教育,而現在有良心、真正專注于教育的培訓機構太少!”說起目前的IT培訓行業,濟南易途科技有限公司創始人有些“恨鐵不成鋼”易途JAVA培訓課堂實景 這些信息并不影響 威而鋼香港 我
  • Response
    政治局常委也稱為五人小組 高雄 威而剛 藥局 向往戰場的人以男人占多數,當然也有少數的女性,他(她)們為什么喜 樂威壯 新竹 歡戰爭,除了對迷戀軍事的原因之外,還有看多了戰爭影視和戰爭新聞,受到影視情節和新聞的感染,或對戰爭影視作品中的主人公十分敬佩、或受國家主義和民族主義的煽動,自己也幻想著上戰場,到戰場上發泄國家主義和民族主義激情…… 高雄 威而剛 藥局。 威而剛 網路 2012年,全球智能手機出貨量達6.86億部,中國約占全球的26.5%,出貨量約為1 樂威壯 新竹.82億部行業觀點認為,隨著智能手機的逐漸普及,消費者對移動購
  • Response
    Response: 犀利士 20mg
    他告訴我他去過很多地方 這樣做的結果就是浪費了巨大的時間的同時也沒有養成 樂威壯價錢 持久的習慣 高雄援交 。比這個更糟糕的是,在多次失敗之后,完美主義和拖延癥占據了自己的大腦,一想到要改變就會感受到要失敗的恐懼,會潛意識的去避開努力和自己最重要的任務,用上網,游戲等等的短期reward讓自己活在自己的comfort zone里面不去面對現實。 我也一直迷茫著,一直思索著活著的意義 樂威壯價錢,尋找著活得幸福的捷徑 高雄援交。還要看著別人的眼色,還要為了生計四處奔 樂威壯售價 波 樂威壯售價。 此外,房間內還有監測器
  • Response
    為迎接首屆南博會 台 台北一夜情 北一夜情 金萍說,今年2月 犀利士,她曾在寶貝回家網注冊信息 台中援交 犀利士 ,志愿者一直在幫她,不過至今還沒有什么進展。她還和河南打拐部門聯系過,也采了血樣,“他們說 台中外送茶,只要拐賣我的人還活著 台南援交,早晚要回去,一定能抓到。”金萍說,在經歷種種苦難后,她已經釋然了,不會怨恨母親,甚至如果母親生活得困頓 持久藥,她也愿意承擔養老的責任 台北援交。“我到現在都不知道自己來自哪,也不知道自己的生日 台北外送茶,感覺活得稀里糊涂的,我就想找 台中援交 到她,問問她。我不恨她,不然也不
  • Response
    Response: 台中一夜情
    堅持眼睛向下看 事實上,無論是成交量增長快于成交額增長,還是成交量增加同時卻 藥局購買樂威壯 伴隨著成交額減少,都在很大程度上說明我國期貨市場價格的整體波動水平在下移在經濟全球化背景下,作為對外原材料依存度較高的制造業大國 藥局購買樂威壯,中國經 台中援交 濟對于國際大宗商品價格的下跌反應敏感 台中援交。 除了創辦企業,增加就業之外 台北一夜情,拉尼婭還成立了一家援助受虐待兒童的專門機構,并親自擔任兒童權利的辯護人。 政府一邊解決計劃經濟遺留下來的問題,一邊破除計劃經濟體制下的政府管理體制和行為規范,其顯 台北一夜情 著
  • Response
    Response: levitra立威大
    就應讓他學習之余 我們撥開面紗,看到一個雞皮 春藥哪買 鶴發的老嫗,瞪著渾濁的雙眼,無奈的守望著同樣垂垂暮年的沈陽站。曾幾何時 春藥哪買,中興一樓改造,博百利帶動了沈陽商業的變局,中興完成了 台北外送茶 一次華麗的升級,消費者驚艷于中興的銳意變革。 不過隨后科學家們“辟謠”稱,這個隕石坑內的鉆石主要為工業用鉆級別,還達不到首飾行業所使用的鉆石標準。 印度總統、副總統、總理每年都要以國家元首的禮遇會見達賴。更為重要的是,印方還不時鼓動達賴走訪中印邊境爭議區,企圖以此增加印度對我藏南地區由非法占有變性為“ 屝利士 合
  • Response
    Response: 威而刚
    脈脈雙目轉向那些魚躍波影 2005年1月18 樂威壯 藥效 日,《人民法院報》研究了《強奸案為何發生在熟人間》的系列性侵犯問題。還有不少的報刊、雜志、網絡、電視 台中一夜情 、電臺都曾開辟過青少年性教育的專欄或節目,這說明青少年性教育已經引起了社會的廣泛關注 樂威壯 藥效,青少年性教育已經可以大大方方的走上講臺,面對面的讓學生受益了學校開展青少年性教育是學校的權利 台中一夜情,也是學校保護未成年人的一項義務。 張懿仁指,而情況恰好相反。施暴是單方面的權力與控制 色片,這與他們之間溝通根本無關。有時其它家庭對暴力 色片 的
  • Response
    空前地激化了階級矛盾 現在的總結XV外形其實很奔放 台中一夜情,我的選擇即綜合也整合,外形不收斂而顏色收斂,所以選擇 台中一夜情 深棕,沒有要當時的現車橙色。 女陰祟拜不僅源自婦女分娩時的直觀 台北援交,而 台北援交 且源自當時的社會發展。母系社會中女性的崇高地位,是使女陰崇拜成為初民的一種普遍心理的社會原因但是以后,經過多少萬年的生活實踐和經驗積累 如何購買威而剛,原始初民逐漸發現陰莖和女陰的接觸會導致懷孕、生育,于是又逐漸興起了男性生殖器崇拜 高雄一夜情,即男根崇拜。 一器之微而剛柔別焉 台南外送 如何購買威而剛 茶

Reader Comments (1)

Florist Auckland inserted classiness within a life of every person
January 24, 2015 | Unregistered CommenterVirtual Travel Group

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.