Video of the Day


Alex Carnevale

Features Editor
Mia Nguyen

Reviews Editor
Ethan Peterson

This Recording

is dedicated to the enjoyment of audio and visual stimuli. Please visit our archives where we have uncovered the true importance of nearly everything. Should you want to reach us, e-mail alex dot carnevale at gmail dot com, but don't tell the spam robots. Consider contacting us if you wish to use This Recording in your classroom or club setting. We have given several talks at local Rotarys that we feel went really well.

Pretty used to being with Gwyneth

Regrets that her mother did not smoke

Frank in all directions

Jean Cocteau and Jean Marais

Simply cannot go back to them

Roll your eyes at Samuel Beckett

John Gregory Dunne and Joan Didion

Metaphors with eyes

Life of Mary MacLane

Circle what it is you want

Not really talking about women, just Diane

Felicity's disguise

Live and Active Affiliates
This area does not yet contain any content.

« In Which We Copy It Down In Their Handwriting »

Over the next week and a half, we'll be looking back at books from our childhood.

Babysitting Opportunities


I haven’t read much of Jonathan Franzen’s work, but there is an essay in his book How To Be Alone that I remember one part of very clearly. He theorizes that there are two sorts of readers in the world:  those who read because it is bourgeois custom, and those who read because they are disappointed by real life. Both readers form their habits in childhood, and one imagines the two children as a pair of mismatched siblings:  one well-adjusted, with a healthy curiosity in life; the other sunk too far into the pleasures of narrative.  

I am paraphrasing a more complex thought of Franzen’s in order to identify myself as the second brand of reader, and to provide the beginning of what might be a picture of myself as a child. When I started reading The Babysitters Club, it was because I found one of the books in our family friends’ house, soon after our family moved back from Holland.  It was the one about Stacey being a lifeguard, or falling in love with a lifeguard — Boy-Crazy Stacey, it was called.  I started reading the book lying on Cheryl’s bed — it was Cheryl’s book. She was older than me by a few years. I remember thinking that this must be what girls read.


Each book in The Babysitters Club series begins with a description of the seven principal characters.  Because the books can be read in any order, the characters barely change over time, and for an avid reader of the series the introductory description soon becomes repetitive.  The seven girls are distinguishable by their outward personality traits and lifestyle choices:  they are seven brands of human teenager, defined not by the things that happen to them or even by their relationships with one another, but with one or two choice adjectives each: Kristy is bossy and tomboyish; Claudia is scatter-brained and artistic; Mary Anne is sensitive and organized; Stacey is sophisticated; Dawn is laid-back and health-conscious. Mallory and Jessi have fewer distinguishing characteristics because they are only eleven.

In an early episode of Mad Men, Don Draper deflects a question about his upbringing by saying that where he was brought up, in the Midwest, it is considered impolite to talk about oneself. The irony is that Don knows no self fixed enough to talk about - for years, he has been pretending to be someone else. In Don Draper we have metaphorical representation of the idea that our outward selves cannot escape fabrication. But he serves to remind us, too, that it is strange we are asked to present ourselves at all, that in job interviews we are asked the question all the babysitters already knew how to answer, though they were only thirteen: “What two words would you use to describe yourself?”

When I started school in upstate New York I was seven, and I had never been around American kids before. Dutch children are much like their parents — stubborn, fair-minded, and unselfconscious. That is a generalization, but it is meant to illustrate the difference between the people I was around when I was very young and the people I grew to know in my adolescence, who were more conscious of what I’ll call their individual identities. It was not until I lived here and spoke English and read American books that I came to expect to be a person who would ever be described in any particular way.  


Those who read The Babysitter’s Club when they were younger will remember that one of the pleasures of the books is their use of handwriting samples. The members of the club keep a record of their babysitting jobs in a notebook and are required by the rules of the club to write a paragraph or two about each job. In each book, a few chapters begin with hand-written passages, and the serial reader learns to recognize each of the seven characters by her handwriting. Kristy writes with the tight, controlled, cheerful cursive of a young athlete; Claudia, whose mind is on other things, writes sloppily and crosses out words due to misspelling; Mary Anne’s handwriting seems old-fashioned and feminine; Stacey prints and dots her lower-case I’s with hearts; Dawn prints too, but her letters are bigger, freer, and reflective of her West Coast upbringing.

Nobody writes by hand anymore, but when I was younger the issue of handwriting so obsessed me that I used to watch Party of Five with a pad of paper on my lap and write out the same sentence (always “The fox jumped over the fence”) in what I imagined were the five different brands of penmanship belonging to the five siblings. That identity and handwriting were inseparable is absolutely an idea I got from The Babysitters Club. In the non-fictional universe, I was perpetually dissatisfied with my own handwriting, and changed it often, depending on which of my friends I most admired at that moment.  I went through a period of thinking my friend Molly’s was perfect, but then, so were her L.L. Bean down vests and the mallards in her parents’ house. Handwriting and lifestyle and identity were all joined in a way I didn’t understand and couldn’t master.  

Nothing about handwriting analysis seems to be very provable, but one tenet that I’ve encountered says that though we try to change our handwriting, the basic gestures that our hands make are learned so young and ingrained so deeply that they will be recognizable all our lives. Which means that, gestures at personal style and branding aside, there are things about ourselves that we can’t change. 


When I was in college, I read Sister Carrie for the first time in an American Studies class. My professor made the argument that Carrie’s failure to succeed in America comes from a level of personal malleability that weakens her; she is of nowhere and goes nowhere, though for brief and finite periods she attaches herself to people with better fortune than her own. Theodore Dreiser draws Carrie in terms that directly oppose the typology of The Babysitters Club:  she struggles because she is without personality. She fails to cultivate herself.

Although it’s silly and very typical of the compulsive reader to identify too deeply with a fictional character, I felt sad when I read Sister Carrie — for myself, and for all the displaced egos in America, who never quite settle on how they want to write. For the members of the Babysitters Club, the tension between being and wanting-to-be never existed at all. Though they lived in a dull and wholesome world, it was a world I wanted to live in.

Elena Schilder is the senior contributor to This Recording. She is a writer living in Brooklyn. She tumbls here. You can find an archive of her writing on This Recording here. She last wrote in these pages about The Roches.

Enjoy The Perils Of A Literary Childhood At Your Leisure

Elena Schilder and The Babysitter's Club

Lily Goodspeed and The Golden Compass

Helen Schumacher and Little House on the Prairie

Jane Hu and Walk Two Moons

Kara VanderBijl and A Wrinkle In Time

Hafsa Arain and Harry Potter

Lucy Morris and Bruno and Boots

Alice Bolin and Nothing's Fair In Fifth Grade

Dayna Evans and The Diary of Anne Frank

References (13)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Response: fCEseAFa
    In Which We Copy It Down In Their Handwriting - Home - This Recording
  • Response
    Response: PuzfYNsR
    In Which We Copy It Down In Their Handwriting - Home - This Recording
  • Response
    If you enjoy football, you most likely have a favored group from the National Football League or two and have a list of players who like to have noticed.
  • Response
    NFL is definitely a single of the most significant sports in America. It has a significant following.
  • Response
    Response: moncler jakker
    In Which We Copy It Down In Their Handwriting - Home - This Recording
  • Response
    check out http://www.dealsextra.com.au/business/Laser-Siege.php for Laser Siege deals, Laser Siege reviews
  • Response
    In Which We Copy It Down In Their Handwriting - Home - This Recording
  • Response
    In Which We Copy It Down In Their Handwriting - Home - This Recording
  • Response
    In Which We Copy It Down In Their Handwriting - Home - This Recording
  • Response
    Response: www.forusers.in
    In Which We Copy It Down In Their Handwriting - Home - This Recording
  • Response
    Response: Russell
    I found a great...
  • Response
    Response: Dylan Linard
    I found a great...
  • Response
    Response: house Plan
    In Which We Copy It Down In Their

Reader Comments (5)

I changed my handwriting frequently, too.

Great piece!
August 8, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterKara
my 5th grade boyfriend used to write his "p"s with just one stroke and I thought it was COOL! love this x
August 8, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterCET
I wrote my 'a's and 'e's like Stacey McGill until my fifth grade teacher told me to cut it out. I obliged him for that year but reverted back in sixth grade. I naturally stopped before middle school, which, maybe not coincidentally, is the same time I stopped reading BSC books.
I like your last sentence. It pretty much describes why I liked the books for so long.
August 8, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterHL
I, too, was once (ahem, maybe still am) an honorary imaginary member of the BSC. The effect that all of this that you write about (and so much more) has been engrained in my sense of self and the ways I relate to the world. I appreciate what you have to say, and I'd LOVE to talk more about all of this with you. Like, a lot.

But, I just have a purely speculative question:

We know that Ann M. Martin had ghost writers for a good number of her books, which makes sense given the formulaic style in which every single one is written. I wonder, though, about the handwritten parts. Did Ann M. write them all or did she farm them out to specific friends/editors or something? How is it that the handwriting is so consistent throughout all of the books?
August 8, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterCasey Ellingsworth
In response to Casey, it was a woman in the art department at Scholastic who did all the writing samples. Holly someone.

As an aside, it was mentioned in one book that Claudia was definitely not dyslexic but her spelling is so reminiscent of the way the dyslexics I work with spell. Writing FRIST instead of FIRST means either 1. You are typing or 2. you have some kind of learning difficulty. That can't be dismissed as being a lazy student.
December 2, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterCharlotte

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.