Quantcast

A Poem for You

UPTICK

We were sitting there, and
I made a joke about how
it doesn’t dovetail: time,
one minute running out
faster than the one in front
it catches up to.
That way, I said,
there can be no waste.
Waste is virtually eliminated.

To come back for a few hours to
the present subject, a painting,
looking like it was seen,
half turning around, slightly apprehensive,
but it has to pay attention
to what’s up ahead: a vision.
Therefore poetry dissolves in
brilliant moisture and reads us
to us.
A faint notion. Too many words,
but precious.

- John Ashbery

This Recording

is dedicated to the enjoyment of audio and visual stimuli. Please visit our archives where we have uncovered the true importance of nearly everything. Should you want to reach us, e-mail alex dot carnevale at gmail dot com, but don't tell the spam robots. Consider contacting us if you wish to use This Recording in your classroom or club setting. We have given several talks at local Rotarys that we feel went really well.

The New York Series

Martin Scorsese Week

Masthead

Alex Carnevale        
Editor-in-Chief            
                                
Molly Lambert          
Managing Editor          
                                  
Will Hubbard            
Executive Editor

Contributors
Yvonne Georgina Puig
Meredith Hight
Durga Chew-Bose
Molly Young
Tyler Coates
Almie Rose
Karina Wolf
Danish Aziz
Eleanor Morrow
Owen Roberts

Comments? Requests?
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Search TR


    Classic Recordings
    Robert Altman Week

    Woody Allen Week


    Molly Lambert's Science Corner


    What would Steve Martin eat?


    G.I. Joe & Zorn's Lemma


    Will explains John Ashbery


    Conspiracy of Amber's Bra


    Magic Meets The Middle East


    This Is How The World Ends


    New Tao Lin!


    Boy Met World


    Why Is Kristen Stewart So Sad?


    The Perils of Dating in L.A.


    Young Anjelica Huston Oozes For You


    Belle & Sebastian's 10 Favorite Albums


    Lindsay Loves Samantha


    Drag Us To Hell


    Molly Lambert On Jack Nicholson


    Recovering From The Hangover


    Down with The Elderly

    Morrissey's Wit and Wisdom

    Advice for the Bride and Groom

    YouTube Tour of Disneyland

    10 Best Political Speeches

    The Best Albums of 2008

    Spores Own You Now

    Your Body's Not a Myspace

    Tyler on Romance

    You're Wonderful Cher

    We Were Them, Once 

    Mamet's Genius

    A New Kind of Porn Star

    NYC on the Cheap

    If It Makes Molly Laugh

    Women & Porn

    The Day The Earth Stood Still Sucked

    Skylines Are Suffering

    What To Do About This One

    Music As You Never Heard It Before


    Wolverine Again


    Summer Romance

     Greatest Jokes Ever


    Molly & I Love You, Man


    Paltrow in Two Lovers

    Dick Cheney Is Lost

    Devendra Talks Natalie

    TR Underlings Fight For Status

    Molly Punks Amy Winehouse

    Julie Klausner and Her Sisters


    Molly's Star Trek


    Glory of Artists' Self-Portraits


    Kill Lists Are Common Courtesy

    Shia: Every Mother's Son


    Legend of Georgia's Parents

    Undercover At A Country Club

    Lauren Among the Wackness


    Babes and Fast Cars


    She's Every Woman


    The Best 50 Singles of 2009 So Far


    Wes Anderson & Pauline Kael


    Ruben's Elevator


    Tyler and Cats


    Go boycrazy maybe


    Almie and the shroud of coupledom


    Murder at the MOMA

    The Sci-Fi Future

    The Print Edition

    capgun3covercoloronly1

    We also make a poetry journal called Cap Gun. Limited supplies are left of Issue 3. Read more here

     

    Entries in owen roberts (6)

    Tuesday
    12Jan2010

    In Which You Have The Power

    Eckhart's Reduction

    by OWEN ROBERTS

    When I was a kid I had this idea that my dad was a Marxist, before I had any idea what Marxism was. My dad is sort of a self-proclaimed Marxist, though he isn't particularly vocal about it, but it manifests in his general attitude toward religion and politics, which is that he tends to be incredibly cynical and doesn't seem to "believe" in anything, other than economic forces maybe. So there was this unspoken dialectic in my house between my atheist dad (he probably wouldn't admit to that, might describe himself as agnostic) and my mom, who is Irish Catholic, and believes that people have souls and stuff. My mom went to church and unconvincingly tried to make me believe in God and think about religion, and is generally more comfortable with feelings and beliefs than my dad or me. Anyway, this possibly overly revealing introduction is just to set up the fact of my complete shock when I found out my dad was reading The Power of Now. I had heard of it but I didn't know much about it. It's a wildly successful self-help book. You can read a lot of it on Google Books.

    The Power of Now actually came out first in 1999, but it started getting really popular in 2008 when Oprah made it a book of the month, which means a ton of people will read it just because she said they should (don't interpret this as disparaging of Oprah, I may not like her taste in books always, but I like her).

    I was really weirded out to find my dad reading the book, because, first, he doesn't have time to read a lot (I think he read a lot of things when he was younger but his default response to questions like, "Hey, dad, did you ever read this copy of Sentimental Education I found in the bookshelf?" is "I don't think I really understood it"), and second, he's an incredible cynic with not a spiritual bone in his body. So this led me to pick up the book and start reading a little bit, because, though I'm used to feeling alienated by the popularity of certain books and media, my dad's interest in anything "soft" piqued my own interest.

    I find the book impossible to read. But there's clearly something successful about it if has become so meaningful to so many people. I've met people my age with, like, regular interests and normal personalities, who say this book changed their life. I have a tendency to assume shit like this is totally exploitative and soft. But if it helps people who am I to say that it's bullshit?

    There isn't even much criticism (not even on the Internet) of the book or its author, Eckhart Tolle, which seems bizarre. It's difficult to back up this claim with research, but this comment on the one blog post I found criticizing Tolle (in like twenty-five pages of Google results) corroborates the claim: "Incidentally, the phrase “i hate eckhart tolle” only gets about half a dozen hits. Likewise, “eckhart tolle sucks” just gets one. It seems to me that the dearth of criticism for something so well read and practically unintelligible is a little concerning. Is there something in the water?" Maybe critics have better things to do.

    I think it's fair to say that people often enjoy books who have a character or protagonist with which the reader can identify.

    Jk. This is probably more accurate.

    Which sort of means is that people like reading about themselves, or at least thinking about themselves while reading, or picturing themselves in a story. That's maybe why there are archetypes, and Peter Parker is like a completely generic looking dude and people talk about whether or not they're Slytherins or Gryffindors or whatever. So it follows that The Power of Now might owe its popularity in part to the fact that each individual can easily imagine themselves as the protagonist.

    You don't escape into a cool fantasy world when reading The Power of Now, you escape into a fantasy of self improvement.

    A gross simplification of the point of The Power of Now: Thinking is bad. Okay, to be honest, I think there is some merit to Tolle's central concept of being present in your life; it's the kind of thing that is absurdly obvious, but might require someone else telling you not to be constantly freaking out about the past and future for you to realize that you were doing it in the first place. But Tolle seems to take this mantra to its most extreme conclusion. Now, this is clearly reductive, but given the repetitive and generally ambiguous nature of Tolle's prose, I don't feel like a close reading is really needed.

    A representative sentence:

    Instead of "watching the thinker," you can also create a gap in the mind stream simply by directing the focus of your attention into the Now. Just become intensely conscious of the present moment. This is a deeply satisfying thing to do.

    I think that's called telling, not showing. Tolle's read on why people are unhappy seems to be that everyone is just super anxious and thinking too much about things, and the way to combat this compulsive thinking is to not think at all, or to think intensely about things that are relatively meaningless. He doesn't offer much in the way of reasonable alternative other than meditating. 

    Tolle's own life makes this whole philosophy suspect. Basically he was a bum. He was depressed and suicidal and turned to spirituality. He sort of implies that he was homeless for like two years. When he had the idea to write a book and eventually make a million dollars, he doesn't mention. It doesn't help that he looks like a total creepy weirdo.

    Dude is too busy not thinking to shave.

    I'm all for relaxing and chilling out and stuff, but I don't think that's what makes people happy. I think not being really bored is what makes people happy, among other things. And, like, success. And probably a lot of other things. Tolle has been accused of trying to be God, which is far fetched, but he's certainly filling the role of some sort of prophet or something. What kind of a prophet is a weird question though. You have to wonder what Eckhart Tolle wants people to do with his book. He wants to help people help themselves, but why?

    The back of The Power of Now labels it as Personal Growth/Spirituality, which means self-help. I looked into the history of the self-help industry a bit, to see where the whole thing got kicked off, and where Tolle fits into it. The first bestselling self-help book was How to Make Friends and Influence People, written by Dale Carnegie, which was published in 1936 and has since sold more than fifteen million copies. Coincidentally, Carnegie's life long dream was to be a Chautauqua lecturer (only a coincidence because I wrote about Chautauqua on this blog), a dream which he never realized. According to his Wikipedia page, one of his most successful business moves was changing his name from Carnagey to Carnegie, in order to associate himself with Andrew Carnegie, and even "was able to rent Carnegie Hall itself for a lecture to a packed house," which seems silly. His middle name is Breckenridge, which I think is a great name, and is also a kind of flower. 

    How to Make Friends and Influence People was only a year old when people started making fun of it, namely, Irving Dart Tressler, who wrote How to Lose Friends and Alienate People (not to confused with Toby Young or a movie that was apparently made based on that book), which Time magazine thought was funny.

    I picked this up at The Strand after seeing it in this movie.

    How to Win Friends and Influence People is written more like a manual for businessmen, Carnegie's industry, employing anecdotal stories to prove points about human behavior and how to exploit it basically. The self-help precedent for The Power of Now is more likely The Power of Positive Thinking, by Norman Vincent Peale (not just because they both have "power" in the titles, there are a lot of self-help books that reference "power" both in their titles and otherwise). Like Tolle, Peale emphasizes conquering anxiety and finding peace of mind, with similar language (though Carnegie resembles Tolle in that both were failures in previous efforts before becoming successful as self-help authors). In his time, Peale was controversial for mixing religion and psychology, and was attacked by mental health experts who called him a fraud and a con man.

    The thing about the word "power" that bothers me is that it doesn't seem to make much sense in the context of self-help. My conception of power is, loosely, one person's ability to control other people, or other abstractions of this idea. The goal of The Power of Now is to help the reader gain power over themselves, which seems to imply that most people exist in a sort of schizophrenic state. I'm sure you can make an argument for this idea, but I find it bothersome nonetheless. Because there is a market for these books, you have to assume that there are people getting something out of them, but I remain skeptical of the ideas that Tolle and other self-help authors offer. I'm not alone either, there are numerous parodies and critics of self-help (though apparently not of Tolle), including George Carlin.

    I think this image sort of sums up my frustration with Tolle. This symbol appears every few pages in The Power of Now, and is intended to signal the reader to pause and think about what they have just read. Ignoring the fact that this is an obvious gimmick to increase the length of the text (only two hundred wide margin pages), it's an incredibly patronizing little symbol to appear every few pages. It only makes me further question the motivation behind the book which is suspect to begin with. But even if I ignore the ambiguous origination of the book, it's still pretty silly.

    It's possible that I'm judging The Power of Now from an unfair and overly literary perspective. My dad's interest in the book caused me to wonder about its influence and appeal for people is because it is so alien to me, but dissecting the book is also patronizing to the fans of the book, in the sense that while Tolle is telling people how they should think, I'm telling people that they're stupid for buying it.

    Owen Roberts is the senior contributor to This Recording. He is a writer living in Brooklyn. You can find his most recent work here.

    "Seduced and Abandoned" - The Magnetic Fields (mp3)

    "Walk A Lonely Road" - The Magnetic Fields (mp3)

    "I Don't Know What To Say" - The Magnetic Fields (mp3)

    You can pre-order the new Magnetic Fields album Realism here.

    Tuesday
    20Oct2009

    In Which We Head To Chautauqua

    The Roberts Family at Chautauqua

    by OWEN ROBERTS

    At the beginning of August, I attended my twenty-third family reunion, in Chautauqua, New York.  The reunion, of my father's family, has happened every year of my life (though I wasn't present when I was zero) and maybe a couple years before, at the same place, during the same week of the summer ("Week Six" which falls when July becomes August). The Friday before I left, when I was telling various friends and acquaintances that I was about to spend a week with my family, I had trouble, as I always have, explaining just what Chautauqua is.

    In a sentence, Chautauqua is a middlebrow resort on the Chautauqua lake in western New York, which provides religious and cultural education and entertainment, as well as physical recreation, to mostly Midwestern families.  It's like family camp, if you know what that is (if you do you are probably from the Midwest). The first "Chautauqua Assembly" was organized in 1874 by a Methodist minister and a businessman, at a campsite on Chautauqua lake, near Jamestown (the home of Lucille Ball).  The summer school format became popular and over the next decade, Chautauquas sprung up around the country, some which were permanent sites, and other "tent Chautauquas" set up in different campsites, traveling throughout the summer. 

    Chautauquas brought culture and entertainment to different communities, with speakers, musicians, preachers and other performers of the time. Theodore Roosevelt called Chautauqua "The most American thing in America."

    With the advent of radio, television, and automobiles, Chautauquas, which had been a primary source of culture for rural communities, became obsolete. Chautauqua, New York, is still, I think, a popular vacation spot, but I'm pretty sure it's the only one left. While politicians like Roosevelt have revered Chautauqua (Woodrow Wilson called it "integral to the national defense" during World War I), other thinkers with less dependence on public opinion haven't been so praiseworthy. Sinclair Lewis called it "nothing but wind and chaff and...the laughter of yokels." William James called it "depressing from its mediocrity."  Gregory Mason dismissed it as "infinitely easier than trying to think."

    The four pillars of Chautauqua are Knowledge, Music, Religion and Art. 

    My experience of Chautauqua has changed several times since I was one, but it has remained one of my favorite weeks of the year.  As a kid, I anticipated Chautauqua the way most kids anticipate Christmas (not that I didn't like Christmas, but Chautauqua was way better). It basically meant a week of relative freedom from my parents and other things that inhibit a kid from living in a complete fantasy world. 

    Because Chautauqua is a gated community (part of what is hard to describe about Chautauqua is the geography and architecture; it's not a typical lake side resort with like little cabins and a big banquet hall or whatever, it's more like a small town on a lake with a fence around it), I was allowed to basically wander around and do whatever I wanted each day, at least until sunset.  

    The grounds are small, there are maybe about five main streets and twenty cross streets, but to a five year old from an actual small town in Vermont, it felt like a vast urban center. I remember discovering more of Chautauqua each year as my familiarity of the grounds grew. 

    One of the first things I discovered as a kid, was that you could buy things by yourself.  This resulted in multiple daily trips to the Chautauqua Book Store, the drug store and the Youth Activity Center, where different kinds of candy and chocolate bars could be purchased. I held a grudge against one aunt for years because she had reported to my mother that I was eating candy all the time.

    These days I don't buy much candy, and I don't get an allowance anymore, so I'm not really excited about having five dollars in my pocket anymore. Instead we have two to three servings of ice cream from The Refrectory, typically after lunch and dinner and sometimes after the evening performance at the Amphitheatre.

    Chautauqua was really about liberation. Probably the most infamous story in the family Chautauqua lore involves me and my cousin Allen, who is two years older than I, sneaking out of the house where my family was staying, wearing only our underwear. I think I was ten years old at the time. We basically just kept daring one another to walk farther away from the house in our skivvies until we were on the stage of the Amp, reenacting a ballet performance we had seen earlier that night. (The Amp is the main performance space in Chautauqua, a large, pale yellow painted wooden structure with wood benches that was left wide open when the performances were over.) So after running around until about two in the morning or so, we went home to find that the door we had left open was locked, and my dad was sitting in the living room, eating chocolate ice cream.

    My dad is notorious for his middle of the night chocolate ice cream trips. We realized we were screwed.  We ended up sleeping in my family's mini-van for a few hours and then trying to sneak into the house after my parents got up in the morning. My parents discovered that we were gone in the morning, and didn't much care, but when Allen's mom discovered that we had disappeared, she called the police. Actually, I don't even remember if that's true or not, but I think it is part of most versions of that story.

    The family consists of my father and his two brothers, their three wives, and two kids each, four boys and two girls. Over the years the aunts have discovered that the brothers have a lot more in common than their looks. It's a little scary actually. All three have mug collections. None of them proposed to their wives. Their "proposal" stories vary, but have in common the theme of being threatened.

    A few years ago my dad organized family dance lessons with a dance instructor at the rec center. In the years past we had always played soccer as a family, but the adults were getting too old and the cousins were beginning to lose interest, so there were a couple years of not having a lot to do, and the dance lessons were intended to replace soccer as a "family activity."

    The first two lessons consisted of ballroom dancing. This was actually fun for me because I was once a ballroom dance instructor. Watching the rest of the family attempt to follow the movement of the instructor, however, was painfully embarrassing. My dad and his brothers are full on Midwestern wasps, making the rest of us at least half wasp or married to a wasp, and if you know what that means you know that it is a bad recipe for dancing.

    I had to leave Chautauqua early that year to go on tour with a band I was playing with at the time (the ill-planned tour never got of the ground and I spent the next couple of weeks crashing at our keyboardist's parent's house in Maplewood, NJ), so I missed the surprise final dance lesson, which apparently was "hip hop." But for the grace of God.

    I lost my virginity at Chautauqua, which is a weird thing to tell people, given that Chautauqua is my family reunion. Part of what continued to make Chautauqua exciting after I had grown out of the running-around-in-my-underwear-after-midnight phase, was that there were other families present at Chautauqua, a few thousand people on the grounds at any given time, which meant there were plenty of other teens around who were equally as bored and hormone driven as I was between the ages of thirteen and seventeen. My first real kiss happened at Chautauqua as well.  These summer romances were confusing and exciting, because one never knew, but hoped to see a paramour fifty-one weeks later.

    Like any family, the dynamics of my father's extended clan are at times tense.  The problems of our individual and collective lives are not talked about, other than in hushed midnight walks with one cousin or another.  Many of these conversations, especially as cousins have gotten older in the past few years, and privy to more secrets of our parents, aunts and uncles lives before our existence, have been revelatory. Arguments are not had, pasts are not discussed and issues are not addressed; it is nothing that would inspire Arthur Miller or Eugene O'Neill, though perhaps Evan S. Connell.

    Despite being present at Chautauqua for the past quarter-decade, the Roberts family goes entirely unnoticed by the Institution as a whole.  It's sort of the nature of our family.  We don't talk loud, we don't participate in group events, we make dinner for ourselves each night instead of attending one of the restaurants on the grounds.  As kids we didn't go to the kid's camp. We go to the lectures but leave before the question and answer section begins.

    This year Ken Burns was one of the big events at the Amp. Ken Burns is probably as emblematic a figure of the Chautauqua brand of intellectualism as one could find. His performance began with a fifteen minute introduction in which he managed to condemn most of modern critical historical thought, what he called "revisionist" historicism, or basically people who acknowledge the problems of western history and colonialism. I guess Ken Burns just loves America, and doesn't see anything wrong with praising it and ignoring the bad stuff. Maybe not, to be honest I don't know much about him, and it doesn't seem like there are any Ken Burns critics out there (am I the first?). Anyway, after the introduction, he showed fifteen minutes of the most boring films of National Parks that I've ever seen. But I think the grey-hairs were really eating it up.  I left.

    Chautauqua does attempt to have programming that appeals to all generations. Every Friday night is "pop" night or something, when they have big name acts at the Amp. In past years these have included Hootie and Blowfish, ABBA (what was left of them), Huey Lewis and the News, Engelbert Humperdinck (we're still not sure who he is). Ray Charles performed the year before he died, which was a great experience, because my father loves him and we grew listening to his music.

    My own cultural maturation is mirrored somewhat by the activities at Chautauqua. When I was a kid I was often dragged screaming and crying from opera or classical music performances at the Amp that my father had made me go to. These days I'm the only member of my generation that enjoys going to see the Chautauqua Symphony, or the chamber music performances in the afternoon.  When I was younger the only thing I got out of the Wednesday night ballet performance was mocking the weird crap that I saw on stage.  Then in high school and college I started thinking, hey these girls are really hot and this dance shit is kind of cool.  In the past couple years, after seeing actual ballet and modern dance performances in New York, I've realized that the dance performances at Chautauqua are a little silly.

    I often wonder how long it will last.  Our attendence this year was smaller than any previous; there were only nine of us, the three brothers, the aunts, myself, my sister and cousin Celine.  I was orphaned for much of the week, as the grown ups paired off, as well as the girl cousins.  I was the only boy cousin left.  I did a lot of reading. I wonder if I'll bring my children to Chautauqua. I can't see any reason why not. Is it really inertia that keeps us coming back each year? If I continue to bring myself and my own future family, will my cousins do the same?  Will the grown ups become the elderly? (Chautauqua is, incidentally, mostly white haired.)

    One thing my family has managed to avoid entirely is the religious education aspect of Chautauqua.  There's a model Israel on the grounds, in a field near the lake, with a little fake Dead Sea, and little towns made out of plaster sculptures embedded in the grass, representing Bethlehem, Jerusalem, etc. They gives tours with Biblical history every Sunday night. When we were kids we went there and pretended we were Godzilla and Mothra, stomping on the towns. 

    Most of us have no religion. My mom is Catholic, but she doesn't talk about it. One of my aunts is "spiritual," and she talks about it, and is usually mocked by the rest of the family. This year she went to Lilydale, a town of mediums, thirty minutes north of Chautauqua.  Her husband referred to it as "Sillydale." 



    Anyway, ignoring other people's religion has never been particularly hard.  While the bizarre "intellectual" climate of Chautauqua can make you want to vomit, you just have to avoid it, because really, Chautauqua is one of the most tranquil places you can find yourself.

    Chautauqua has become sort of a meta-vacation for my family in the sense that in the past few years, since the youngest cousin matriculated into college, the week has been spent more in recollection of previous Chautauqua memories and stories, instead of creating new ones.  I tend to think that Chautauqua means more to me than anyone else, but perhaps we all think that. 

    Owen Roberts is the senior contributor to This Recording. He is a writer living in New York. He last wrote in these pages about the history of the cookie and Yoni Wolf.

    "New Wave (Against Me cover)" - Ben Lee (mp3)

    "Rock Boys (The Grates cover)" - Ben Lee (mp3)

    "Blue Denim" - Ben Lee (mp3)

    Monday
    21Sep2009

    In Which Eskimo Snow Drops And We Wonder Why?

    The Adult-Contempo Yoni Wolf

    by OWEN ROBERTS

    I heard Yoni Wolf's voice for the first time in Iowa City, at an independent record shop on University of Iowa's campus. I don't think I'd ever done this before or since, but I liked the music I heard playing in the store, and asked the cashier what it was. He was a big guy with light curly hair, and I remember thinking he seemed cool. He pointed to the cLOUDDEAD album, Ten, which was on display on a shelf across the store.

    Ten is a weird album, and when I played it for my friends at home it instigated a long, arduous argument about the merits of music that made for such difficult listening. I defended the album aggressively, and after having spent my freshman year at Wesleyan University, where experimental music is kind of the Thing, I felt pretty righteous in my appreciation of all things weird. My friends thought it was obnoxious, meaningless, noisy crap that only pretentious dicks would like (paraphrasing).

    Admittedly, cLOUDDEAD lyrics often don't make much sense. The argument was basically whether that meant that the songs themselves were meaningless. There were a lot of things that I didn't yet really know or think about at the time, like what it meant for white people to be making arty music that sounds sometimes like rap. But at the time we were hopelessly concerned with trying to parse some meaning from the words on the album. The album begins:

    The wood man and his splintering self, The wood woman and her hollowing out The wood man and his splintering self, The wood woman and her hollowing out The wood man and his splintering self, The wood woman and her hollowing out Elvis, what happened Popsicle, the label stapled speaker, To the back of a sheep's throat, Tongue depressor with the width of a spatula suppresses all, Bah bah blah, bah bah blah, end end end quote

    So this was a fruitless effort, but my point, however convoluted it may have been at the time, was that obvious ways of interpreting the lyrics were more or less pointless, because it wasn't about a message or anything like that, it wasn't supposed to be "meaningful." In the end, my friends didn't like the music (whether it was the lyrical content, the music or the general sort of ironic coolster vibe of the album) and I did, and our arguments were formed from such extreme sides that no middle ground would be reached.

    I had more or less forgotten cLOUDDEAD when Why?'s Alopecia came out. When I heard Alopecia, I knew I recognized certain lyrics, but I couldn't remember where they were from. I became obsessed with Alopecia, but it wasn't until a few months later when I was visiting my parents in Richmond, and, going through old CDs to find something to listen to in the car, I came across Ten, and put it on in the car, and realized those were the lyrics I was hearing. Alopecia's "The Vowels Pt. 2" and cLOUDDEAD's "3 Twenty" share the phrase, "I'm not a lady's man, I'm a landmine / Filming my own fake death." It was a cool moment. I became more obsessed with Alopecia, and actually read some shit on the Internet about Yoni Wolf and anticon. I probably listened to the album twice a day for two months, maybe longer.

    I told my friends about Alopecia, without mentioning the whole cLOUDDEAD thing, and then a few months after that I hung out with Taylor, my friend most ardently disdainful of cLOUDDEAD, who has been in Japan and not America for the past two years, but was visiting, and somehow Why? came up, and we started quoting lyrics to each other. He was as obsessed with the album as I was. It was like being dorky sixth graders again, singing lyrics together, except we weren't singing Smashing Pumpkins.

    Why?'s forthcoming Eskimo Snow, which this piece of writing is ostensibly about, was recorded during the same sessions as Alopecia, but, according to the anticon press release for the album, "The vision for the separate albums emerged on a snowed-in night after a hot toddy or two. If Alopecia, however inexplicably, maintains a summery tone, then Eskimo Snow captures the bite and resignation associated with the Midwestern winters that these Cincinnati boys grew up with."

    Snow is apparently a big deal in Cincinnati, at least Google Image Search leads me to believe so

    Musically, Eskimo Snow, has more or less the same instrumentation as Alopecia, but all the edge of it's predecessor has been smoothed out, atonality and creepy samples abandoned in favor of major and harmonic minor chords. The album is definitely the most adult-contempo of Why?'s career, and though I don't feel that it has crossed the line to being boring, I hope it doesn't mean that it is "the direction he's going in" (it reminds me of a conversation I've had with several different friends trying to name an artist who got better or stayed at least as good as they got older). Anyway, the point is that the album is a lot cleaner and more "pop" than anything else he's put out. It's a long way from Oaklandazulazylum.

    Eskimo Snow is also different from Why?'s earlier work because there isn't any rapping. Earlier Why? albums have always been a mix of singing and rapping, sometimes blurring the two. I wouldn't say that it represents a shift away from rapping for Yoni Wolf, though perhaps it is the result of increased confidence in his singing.

    I've always wanted to write about Why? because I've thought a lot about the blend of indie rock and rap and the strange cultural space that Yoni Wolf has created within the contentious world of white rap, but the album I'm talking about doesn't having rapping on it, which may be good, because, for all the thinking I've done about it, I'm sure that Wolf has done a hundred times more, so for now I'll trust that he knows what he's doing.

    I will say that I like Wolf's rapping because he raps about things that, though explored exhaustively in indie rock, are very foreign to hip hop, a genre that often seems preoccupied with machismo. He's pretty good at rapping, I think, but it doesn't sound like main stream rap because he writes about his neuroses a lot more than he does about money and women and how he's better at rapping than other rappers.

    The hook of "This Blackest Purse," released a few weeks ago on RCRD LBL, has the effect of a lead single release. It contains the phrase, "Mom am I failing?" Imagine that coming from the voice of Lil Wayne or Eminem.

    Well, maybe Eminem

    Wolf's writing is bold in how revealing and frankly uncomfortable it can be. My relationship to Wolf's writing is similar to that of my favorite novelists, like John Updike or Philip Roth (not that they bear any resemblance beyond my familiarity with each--well, maybe Roth), where I find myself, upon starting a new book, often thinking things, "Oh, boy, why did you have to do that?" or "Okay, I'm just going to assume that this is sort of a joke." You get to a point where you feel personally involved with the work of an artist and feel disappointment or satisfaction with their decisions.

    I love John Updike, but this book is fucking terrible, and I sincerely hope that it is supposed to be a joke

    It's hard to tell if Wolf's boldness is intentional or not. The body of his writing creates a bizarre self-portrait, which is clearly a blend of fiction and autobiography. His frequent use of confessional and embarrassing references seems compulsive--both Alopecia and Eskimo Snow contain numerous references to crying both in public and in private. Unlike his writing for cLOUDDEAD, which is absurd and emotionally detached, the lyrics are so bluntly revealing they can be hard to take seriously (from "Good Friday": "Sucking dick for drink tickets / To the free bar at my cousin's bat mitzvah" is a good example). Parsing the "true" from the "fictional" in Wolf's writing becomes an obsessive but impossible game.

    If Alopecia is obsessed with death and sex and the conflation of the two, Eskimo Snow shows a bit more self-consciousness about a particular form of posturing involved in singing so liberally about suicide, homosexuality, death and abuse, and the fictionality of his performance.

    "This Blackest Purse," begins in this vein:

    I'm not who, with my eyes from stage, I claim to be I've only cradled death in my own ending Flesh from far off and abstracted lit Candle wick flickering

    And when a thing starts finishing around me I faint or fake a mustache, an accent, or flee In fear my expired license be pulled by sheer proximity

    If nothing else, Wolf is always self-deprecating, and in Eskimo Snow he has found another issue to explore: the way he writes about his issues.

    And I never got a name for my shady compulsion 'Cause I messed up and kissed my shrink in a Jersey City hotel room And I know saying all this in public should make me feel funny But you gotta yell something out you'd never tell nobody

    I'm worried that it sounds like I'm starting analyze Wolf himself, but what I'm talking about is the way that his persona becomes convoluted through the repetition and variation of these themes. Parsing the real from the fake and the meaning from the style becomes the game of listening to Why? Wolf's songs are preoccupied with the minutiae of hipster style, romance, obsession; most things that young people experience, which is melded with his more bizarre rhymes about death, and decay and depression. The opening lines of Eskimo Snow, in "These Hands," cover most of everything he tends to talk about, including Jesus and his father (references to both appear often):

    I wear the customary clothes of my time Like Jesus did, with no reason not to die Facing history, with little to no irony Like i'm some forgotten southern city, Sherman razed Still hid under thick smoke after all these years

    These hands, are my father's hands but smaller Soaked in paint thinner, Until they're so dry coming together, They make the sound of resisting each other A shrill squeal like two moving rubber, tires touching Hide nothing, hide nothing

    Alopecia and previous albums tend to dwell on death and suicide, and while those motifs are certainly present in Eskimo Snow, the album feels on the whole more somber than Why?'s earlier work. Descriptions of loneliness and emotional detachment appear in places that would have previously been occupied by references to masturbation (and occasionally alongside).

    The detached edge Wolf brought to certain confessional lines is not so prevalent, though he occasionally drops lines like "Still sportin' my ex-girlfriend's dead ex-boyfriend's boxers." The general feeling of the album is one of maturity, the music is more controlled, the lyrics are more somber and have fewer moments of goofiness.

    Although I discovered Alopecia after college, listening to Why? and any new music is heavily informed by my experience at Wesleyan, where there's a good experimental music program, and students spend a lot of time declaring things are "cool" and then later deciding they are not cool. I had the advantage of never having been cool, so being or becoming cool was way beyond me. But I made friends that had a different way of thinking about music, not one that is necessarily better or worse, but maybe a little more challenging in the sense that it became slightly more important to like good/cool music, but at the same time long, earnest discussions about the merits of an album or artist were no longer really acceptable.

    So what my high school friends liked about Why? that they didn't like about cLOUDEAD was that the lyrics were more meaningful, but my college friends weren't into Why? because it isn't cool, in part because of the emotion expressed by the same words. "Cool" is a very general term. I guess what I'm talking about is that when I first discovered cLOUDDEAD I wasn't sure what I was listening to really, I didn't necessarily get the irony, I just liked the music and thought the rapping was interesting and funny. It's similarly difficult to say that Why? is cool or uncool, because it's hard to figure out what is ironic and what is serious. Music being isn't necessarily important, but it does have something to do with what you listen to and how you listen to it.

    Rap is unquestionably cool, making bad rap unquestionably uncool, and being a white rapper doesn't help that, but it's more the earnestness of Why? that makes it uncool. Actually, my roommate Will (a Wesleyan grad) just summed it up perfectly: "It's a little too emo..." Emo is definitely not cool.

    Deciding that things are cool is perhaps a pointless gesture, but it has a monetary correlative, which is people buying music and concert tickets and telling other people to do the same. I think the point is that Why? is interesting to me because it often seem deliberately uncool. It's weird, actually, writing about Why?, because I am not nor do I desire to be a music journalist, but I've thought a lot about the band and the lyrics, so writing about it is both a natural and unfamiliar activity. It's also strange, because I had never heard Eskimo Snow before I proposed writing about it, so I approached listening to it knowing that I would be writing this piece. The first few listens felt like work, but it is now like any other Why? album in that I find myself wanting to listen to it over and over again.

    Owen Roberts is the senior contributor to This Recording. He is a writer living in New York. He last wrote in these pages about the history of the cookie.

    digg delicious reddit stumble facebook twitter subscribe

    "On Rose Walk, Insomniac" — Why? (mp3)

    "Against Me" — Why? (mp3)

    "Eskimo Snow" — Why? (mp3)

    "Berkeley by Hearseback" — Why? (mp3)

    The Best of Owen Roberts on This Recording

    A short history of cookies.

    Literary forgery breaks hearts.

    Cory, Shawn, and Topanga.